Thursday 29 December 2016

Brother of JonBenet Ramsey sues CBS for $750M over series




DENVER (AP) -- The older brother of JonBenet Ramsey is suing CBS and others for $750 million, saying his reputation was ruined after a television series that concluded he killed his 6-year-old sister two decades ago.
In the lawsuit filed Wednesday, Burke Ramsey claims that the network, its production company and the experts interviewed in the series on the unsolved murder conspired to defame him for publicity and profit. The series, called "The Case of JonBenet Ramsey," aired in September ahead of the 20th anniversary of JonBenet's death.
The beauty pageant star was found dead in the basement of her family's home in Boulder, Colorado, the day after Christmas in 1996. A prosecutor cleared her parents and brother in 2008 based on DNA evidence. But the district attorney currently overseeing the case has said it was premature to exonerate the Ramseys and ordered additional tests using new DNA testing technology that authorities hope will further the investigation.
Police have collected and studied thousands of pieces of evidence and say the case remains open.
CBS spokesman Dustin Smith declined to comment on the lawsuit, which is the second Burke Ramsey has filed over the television series.
In October, Ramsey, 29, sued a forensic pathologist featured on the show who said he bludgeoned his sister to death. The pathologist is also named in the latest lawsuit, which was filed in Michigan, where Burke Ramsey lives.
The new lawsuit says CBS and its featured experts set out to conduct a "sham reinvestigation" of the murder with "the preconceived the story line" that Ramsey killed his sister and conspired with his parents to cover it up.
"The accusation that Burke Ramsey killed his sister was based on a compilation of lies, half-truths, manufactured information, and the intentional omission and avoidance of truthful information about the murder of JonBenét Ramsey," the lawsuit says.

A military-themed restaurant chain with scantily-clad waitresses is ready to take over America

A restaurant chain where waitresses wear crop tops and bullet belts is ready to take over America, thanks to the rise of the "breastaurant" and the election of Donald Trump. 
The military-themed sports bar and restaurant chain Bombshells is preparing to expand from four locations in Texas to up to 100 restaurants across the country in the next five years, the New York Post reported on Tuesday. 
Bombshells' sales grew a whopping 10.5% in the fourth quarter, parent company RCI Hospitality Holdings reported earlier in December. 
The chain is benefitting from two factors — the popularity of racy breastaurant chains and the election of Donald Trump. 
Bombshells' representative told the New York Post that the chain is not a breastaurant. However, with scantily-clad waitresses and annual "Snow Bunny Pageants," the concept has some clear similarities to chains like Hooters and Twin Peaks. 
These similarities put Bombshells in a good position to thrive as the wider restaurant industry struggles. The breastaurant business has exploded in the last few years. By providing a provocative dining experience customers can't get elsewhere, chains like Twin Peaks (the fastest-growing American restaurant chain in 2014) and Bombshells have found a way to attract customers — something that's crucial as more and more customer are eating at home. 


A more recent boost for Bombshells' business was the election, according to the company's most recent earnings call. 
"I think overall the election is turning out to be very, very positive for us so far," Eric Langan, the CEO of RCI (which also owns six nightclub concepts), said on a call with analysts in December. 
Langan said that the company is "very excited" about the nomination of Andy Puzder, the CEO of Carl's Jr. and Hardee's parent company, as secretary of labor. Puzder, who is no stranger to utilizing scantily-clad women in advertising himself, is expected to cut regulation and reduce costs in the restaurant industry.

Obama names Utah, Nevada monuments despite GOP opposition


SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- President Barack Obama designated two national monuments Wednesday at sites in Utah and Nevada that have become key flashpoints over use of public land in the U.S. West, marking the administration's latest move to protect environmentally sensitive areas in its final days.

The Bears Ears National Monument in Utah will cover 1.35 million acres in the Four Corners region, the White House said. In a victory for Native American tribes and conservationists, the designation protects land that is considered sacred and is home to an estimated 100,000 archaeological sites, including ancient cliff dwellings.

It's a blow for state Republican leaders and many rural residents who say it will add another layer of unnecessary federal control and close the area to new energy development, a common refrain in the battle over use of the American West's vast open spaces. Utah's attorney general vowed to sue.

In Nevada, a 300,000-acre Gold Butte National Monument outside Las Vegas would protect a scenic and ecologically fragile area near where rancher Cliven Bundy led an armed standoff with government agents in 2014. It includes rock art, artifacts, rare fossils and recently discovered dinosaur tracks.

The White House and conservationists said both sites were at risk of looting and vandalism.

"Today's actions will help protect this cultural legacy and will ensure that future generations are able to enjoy and appreciate these scenic and historic landscapes," Obama said in a statement.
 His administration has rushed to safeguard vulnerable areas ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration. It has blocked new mining claims outside Yellowstone National Park and new oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean. Obama's creation and expansion of monuments covers more acreage than any other president.

But Trump's upcoming presidency has tempered the excitement of tribal leaders and conservationists, with some worrying he could try to reverse or reduce some of Obama's expansive land protections.

Utah's Republican senators vowed to work toward just that.

"This arrogant act by a lame duck president will not stand," U.S. Sen. Mike Lee tweeted about Bears Ears, which is named for a set of rock formations.

Sen. Orrin Hatch said Obama showed "an astonishing and egregious abuse of executive power" and that "far-left special interest groups matter more to him than the people who have lived on and cared for Utah's lands for generations."

Christy Goldfuss, managing director of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said the Antiquities Act that allows a president to create monuments does not give a president authority to undo a designation, a rule the courts have upheld. She acknowledged that Congress could take action, though.

Opponents agreed the area is a natural treasure worth preserving but worried the designation would restrict oil and gas development as well as residents' ability to camp, bike, hike and gather wood.

New mining or energy development will be banned, but existing operations won't be affected, federal officials said. Wood and plant gathering is still allowed as well as hunting, fishing and other recreation, they said.

Members of Utah's all-GOP congressional delegation had backed a plan to protect about 1.4 million acres at Bears Ears, while opening up other areas of the state for development.

The boundaries of the monument are roughly based on that plan — significantly smaller than what a coalition of tribes had sought.

But Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye called it an exciting day for his tribe and people of all cultures.

"We have always looked to Bears Ears as a place of refuge," Begaye said. "The rocks, the winds, the land — they are living, breathing things that deserve timely and lasting protection."

The Navajo Nation is one of five tribes that will get an elected official on a first-of-its-kind tribal commission for the Bears Ears monument. It will provide federal land managers with expertise about the area, officials said.

Tucked between existing national parks and the Navajo reservation, the monument features stunning vistas at every turn, with a mix of cliffs, plateaus, towering rock formations, rivers and canyons across wide expanses covered by sagebrush and juniper trees.

At the Gold Butte site, Native American rock art and artifacts are scattered amid rugged mountains, sandstone formations and Joshua tree forests. Pioneers used the area for cattle ranching and mining, while campers and ATV riders enjoy it today. It's named for an early 1900s mining town.

Retiring Democratic Sen. Harry Reid pushed for protection of the remote area northeast of Lake Mead, but GOP members of Nevada's congressional delegation have been vocal opponents.

The "designation is a wonderful capstone to a career of fighting to protect Nevada's pristine landscapes," Reid said in a statement.
 Nevada Sen. Dean Heller and Gov. Brian Sandoval, both Republicans, said Congress should make land designations.

But the governor said he "recognized the inevitability" of the move and met with landowners and White House officials to ensure it aligned with state water law and the land would be open to recreation.

Debbie Reynolds, ‘Singin’ in the Rain’ Star and Mother of Carrie Fisher, Dead at 84


Sunday 25 December 2016

Celebrity Husband of Man Who Harassed Ivanka Trump Trolled on Amazon



Ivanka Trump at Trump Tower lobby in New York City. (Photo: Getty Images)
Two men and their child were kicked off a JetBlue flight from New York to San Francisco on Thursday after one of the men recognized Ivanka Trump and allegedly harassed her before takeoff.
Daniel Goldstein, an attorney from Brooklyn, accosted Ms. Trump who was traveling with her husband Jared Kushner and their three children.
“Why is she on our flight? She should be flying private.” Goldstein reportedly said. It’s unclear whether the comment was made directly to Ivanka or simply said aloud.
The ordeal was captured in images published to Twitter by Goldstein’s husband, Matthew Lasner, and a backlash is costing him on Amazon.
Lasner, a professor at Hunter College’s department of urban policy and planning in New York City, is the author of “High Life: Condo Living In The Suburban Century” and his book is being flooded with 1-star reviews, most containing plane-related puns.
Amazon user Tom Wellborn writes: “An oddly written book. Seems to start in one direction, then flys over to another unrelated subject, then jets back to yet another area, left me feeling Blue….” user fmp4369 writes: “Book left me feeling like I was stuck at an airport. Story didn’t have any altitude. Hopefully it’s not made into an in flight movie.”
Some are less subtle with their critiques: “Should be called Low Life.” writes Anthony S. “Author Matthew Lasner is one of the two angry men (married) who publicly harassed Ivanka Trump and her family on a JetBlue flight in December 2016. Do not support or purchase anything this man touches.” says Terrance Wilson.
Only one review on the Amazon product page is from someone who made a registered purchase. Someone did fire back a review in Lasner’s defense, user Axisofevil said: “Well written and researched. A thorough examination of suburban v urban existence. Not recommended for white supremacists.”
The plane altercation set off a firestorm on social media and became national news thanks mostly to Lasner’s tweets. Lasner’s tweets, all of them, have since been deleted.
A fellow passenger, Marc Scheff, who was sitting in the next row up from Trump, shared his story with facebook:

Russian plane with 92 aboard crashes into the Black Sea

Russian plane with 92 aboard crashes into the Black Sea

Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press,Associated Press 42 minutes ago 

Saturday 17 December 2016

Trump in Denial as Evidence Grows Spymaster Putin Behind Election Hacks



With intelligence officials convinced that Russian spook-turned-presidentVladimir Putinpersonally directed cyber-attacks aimed at interfering with the U.S. election, President-electDonald Trump continues to downplay and dismiss growing hacking concerns as politically motivated.
The hacks saw the systems and accounts of political organizations and figures like the Democratic National Committee breached, and private data – in the most notable cases, emails – spilled out into public view.
“The primary goal of this attack on our election system was to sow chaos and apparently to help the candidate Donald Trump,” Olsen, an ABC News consultant, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center and a supporter of Hillary Clinton, said.
But Trump is having none of it.
“If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act?” Trump tweeted on Thursday. “Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?”
But that’s not the case, and sources say that intelligence operatives are seething that their future boss is so outwardly dismissing their work.
The Obama administration began publicly sounding the alarm well before the election.
A joint statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department ofHomeland Security in on Oct. 7 was clear: “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.”
With uncharacteristic transparency, the agencies went on to say that they “believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”
Fast-forward two months to today, when White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest went further.
“Based on my personal reading…they were referring to the senior most government official in Russia,” Earnest said.
“It was not intended to be subtle.”
The concerns weren’t just raised by the Obama administration.
Well before she lost to Trump in early November, Clinton was sounding off about Russian hackers targeting her party and staff.
“There's no doubt now that Russia has used cyber-attacks against all kinds of organizations in our country, and I am deeply concerned about this. I know Donald is very praise worthy of Vladimir Putin,” she said during the first presidential debate in September.

Trump angrily dismissed those concerns later in the evening, retorting “She's saying Russia, Russia, Russia, but I don't—maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?”
Four days ago, Trump – now president-elect and capable of receiving classified intelligence briefings – used a similar line.
“They have no idea if it's Russia or China or somebody. It could be somebody sitting in a bed some place,” Trump said in an interview with Fox News last Sunday. “I mean, they have no idea.”
Despite the incoming president’s dismissals, American authorities said on Thursday that they now have new, significant evidence proving Putin directed the cyber operation.
“They know with a near certainty that Putin was involved – that’s not something they say lightly,” Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant who served in the administrations of Presidents Reagan, Clinton and both Bushes. “That's something they say when they do have a smoking gun.”
Trump is becoming increasingly alone in his skepticism of the intelligence community’s conclusions.
On Wednesday, leading Republican Senator Lindsey Graham (SC) called on Trump to impose sanctions that would punish Russia for its hacking of the Democrats’ systems.

“It could be us the next time – this is not a Republican, Democratic issue,” Graham said in an interview. “My goal is to put on President Trump’s desk crippling sanctions based on the fact that they interfered in our elections.”
“They need to pay a price,” he added.
And what that price will be isn’t yet clear, though President Barack Obama has vowed action.
“That response could be through the use of treasury department sanctions, it could be covert action, it could be forms of public diplomacy,” John Carlin, the former head of the Justice Department’sNational Security Division, told ABC News. “If you mess with the United States, we will mess with you back.”
For his part, Obama is playing coy.
In an interview with NPR that was released on Thursday night, Obama said that he thinks that “there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections ... that we need to take action and we will. At a time and a place of our own choosing.
“Some of it may be explicit and publicized; some of it may not be," Obama said.

President Obama Says Hillary Clinton Was Not 'Treated Fairly' During Presidential Election


President Obama said today that he did not think Hillary Clinton was “treated fairly” during the presidential election.
Obama was asked specifically during a news conference whether his former secretary of state lost because of Russia’s reported hacking of the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign computer servers. The president pivoted on that question, and instead lobbed a critique of the media. He said he found the coverage of Clinton “troubling.”
“I think she's worked tirelessly on behalf of the American people and I don't think she was treated fairly during the election, I think the coverage of her -- and the issues -- was troubling,” he said.
Clinton and her campaign in recent days have also expressed disappointment with news outlets' focus on her private email server during the campaign over Russia’s involvement in the data breaches. Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, called the coverage of the Russia story “lackadaisical,” and Clinton last night reportedly told donors in New York that she was glad the press was catching onto the issue.
Looking ahead, President Obama said that perhaps he can give “counsel and advice” to the Democratic Party.
“The question is how do we rebuild that party as a whole so that there's not a county in any state -- I don't care how red -- where we don't have a presence and we're not making the argument because I think we have the better argument,” he said of the Democratic Party.
He added that he would have liked to have helped more to build a national and successful party but struggled to contribute more time because of his primary responsibilities at the White House.

Wednesday 14 December 2016

Politics Execs representing a whopping $3 trillion just walked into Trump Tower





Whoa, that's a lot of dough walking around in Trump Tower.
President-elect Donald Trump 's mega technology summit in New York on Wednesday hosted leaders of companies that have a combined market value of more than $3 trillion.
That's more than the GDP of many countries, including, the United Kingdom, France and India, according to data from the World Bank Group. Trump's tech guests would rank as the fifth-largest country in the world based on GDP.
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), of course, came at the top of the list with a market value of $616 billion. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) followed with values of $555 billion and $489 billion, respectively.
Here's the full list:
 
Apple — $616 billion
Alphabet — $555 billion Microsoft — $489 billion Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) — $366 billion
Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) — $347 billion
Intel — $173 billion Oracle — $167 billion IBM — $160 billion Cisco — $154 billionTesla — $32 billion SpaceX — $15 billion Total — $3.074 trillion 
Trump met with most of America's biggest tech companies in an effort to look for common ground after an exceptionally heated and contentious election. The group was expected to discuss U.S. job creation, and how tech firms can work with the government to improve efficiency.

A Drunk Kim Jong Un Is an Angry Kim Jong Un


It’s not easy being Kim Jong Un. The supreme leader of cash-strapped and hermitted North Korea has to juggle building up a nuclear weapons program, going toe to toe with the American capitalist “empire of devils,” ensuring all North Korean men obey the law and get his haircut, banning sarcasm, and, of course, looking at things. It’s a tall order for one short man, so he can be excused for needing to unwind after a long day’s work with a stiff drink.
Unfortunately for the country’s military elders, a drunk Kim is sometimes an angry Kim. On Tuesday, Japanese press reported that Kim gave a fierce drubbing down to the country’s top military leaders after having a few too many.
“That none of you were able to produce not even one [sic] military satellite is a misconduct that is commensurate to treason,” Kim reportedly told senior officials during the drunken tirade, which occurred in September. As punishment, he allegedly made them stay up all night to write letters of apology.
A scolding from one’s boss is never fun. But in the brutal dictatorship of North Korea, it can be a death sentence. Since taking power upon the death of his father, Kim Jong-Il, Kim Jr. has reportedly consolidated power and stamped out any whiff of descent within the country’s opaque power circles.
In September, Kim reportedly had one of his senior officials executed for simply slouchingduring a meeting. He also was rumored to have two other officials executed in August by anti-aircraft guns — one for proposing policies that challenged the supreme leader, and the other for falling asleep in a meeting, though those reports could not be confirmed.
North Korea’s aggressive antics, including a nuclear weapons test in September, have frayed the international community’s nerves. The U.N., with China’s support, agreed to slap new sanctions on the country in late November in one of President Barack Obama’s last major international diplomatic pushes before Donald Trump becomes president. An increasingly erratic (or drunk) Kim, armed with nuclear weapons, is probably the last thing the world wants to manage during a U.S. presidential transition, and experts predict Kim could test Trump once he takes office.
Suffice it to say, the generals on the receiving end of Kim’s drunken tirade had the worst night of their lives. Luckily, in the morning, after he’d sobered up, Kim apparently forgot what he’d done. “Why are you gathered here?” Kim asked them. “Be careful about your health because you are all old,” he added, maliciously. They reportedly began weeping with joy for the unexpected reprieve/next-day amnesia.
“The military officials probably cried because of the sudden release of tension of being executed,” an anonymous North Korean source told Japanese newspaper Toyko Shimbun. “Everyone is showing loyalty out of fear of being executed and no one dares speak against Kim.”

DNC contractor thought agent calling about hack might be an impostor: NYT investigation


A technology support contractor who worked at the Democratic National Committee was concerned an FBI agent who called to tell the organization it had been hacked was an impostor.
That revelation is among the many in an extensive New York Times investigation published Tuesday about a Russian cyberattack operation. Intelligence officials believe it started as an effort to gather information and then changed into a push to harm Democrat Hillary Clinton, the newspaper reported.
The report, which drew many parallels to the Watergate bugging scandal, details the hackers' methods for gaining access to emails of Democratic operatives and highlights the missed opportunities to stem the attacks' ramifications. The emails, obtained from both the DNC and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, were heavily reported on this summer in the heat of the presidential election after they were leaked by Wikileaks.
The Times report also said a Clinton campaign aide inadvertently told Podesta a phishing email about changing his password was legitimate. He meant to type illegitimate, but a typo led to him falling victim to the attack.

The strongest (and weakest) American cities



You won’t be surprised to hear the technology industry’s doing just fine. But parts of the manufacturing sector are thriving as well, no matter what Donald Trump says about it.
The Milken Institute’s annual ranking of best-performing cities crowns the same top 5 as last year, in slightly different order—San Jose, Calif., Provo, Utah, San Francisco, Austin and Dallas. Those cities represent Silicon Valley and other tech hubs that have been thriving for years.
A new part of the story, however, is a strong showing by a few southern and Midwestern cities that reflects the revival of the US auto industry. Detroit rises from 155 last year to 111 this year—fairly far down the list, but a huge improvement. Nashville jumps 11 places to No. 7, largely because of ramped-up production by Nissan and Cadillac. And Monroe, Mich., lands at No. 14 on the best small-cities list, up from 30 last year, thanks to new investments by Tesla (TSLA) and other automotive producers.
“The good news in the Midwest has been that if you have auto or parts production, you’re part of that supply chain, you’re doing a bit better,” Ross DeVol of the Milken Institute tells Yahoo Finance in the video above. Here are this year’s top 10:

The Milken project evaluates the nation’s 200 largest cities according to economic criteria such as job and wage growth and the presence of wealth-creating high-tech industries. The annual results usually reflect trends in the overall economy. The energy bust, for instance, pushed Houston down 42 places, to No. 68 this year. Fargo, N.D., a shale-oil hub that exploded in growth in recent years, fell from first among small cities last year to 15th in 2016.
Other parts of the Midwest haven’t been as lucky as some of the auto cities. The strengthening dollar has hurt exports this year, and that, in turn, has hurt cities dependent on foreign markets, such as Indianapolis, Lexington, Ky., and Little Rock, Ark. A marked slowdown in China’s economic growth hurt cities that do a lot of trading with Asia, such as Tacoma, Wash.—which fell 70 places to 131st. At the bottom of this year’s list are Shreveport, La., and Gulfport, Miss.–both dependent on oil drilling–and Erie, Pa.
But there’s more good news than bad in this year’s rankings, since the overall economy has been adding jobs and pay is starting to drift upward nationally. Happy days have finally returned to Florida, after the housing bust wrecked the real-estate market in several overheated cities, literally driving people out of the state. Daytona Beach jumped 68 places, to No. 69 on this year’s list, making it the biggest gainer in 2016. Other winners were Jacksonville and Port St. Lucie. If the sun is out in Florida, the clouds might start to part elsewhere as well.